
New Delhi - The Supreme Court on Tuesday made it clear that the CBI has not been prohibited from probing the disproportionate assets case against BSP chief Mayawati and issued notice to the Centre, CBI and former Uttar Pradesh chief minister on a plea to review its verdict that quashed the DA case.
A bench of justices P Sathasivam and Dipak Misra issued notice and made it clear that it would only clarify its July 6 verdict, quashing the DA case against Ms. Mayawati, on a review petition filed in the case.
“We issue notice to the Union of India, CBI and Mayawati only for this clarification,†the bench said.
The court during the argument made it clear that the CBI “is at liberty to probe the DA case and they can approach the government for this.â€
“We never said that CBI has no power to investigate. It can do so, but has to get sanction from the state government,†the bench said.
The bench further said its verdict quashing the DA case was not to protect anyone
The review petition has been filed by Uttar Pradesh native Kamlesh Verma who was an intervener in the case filed by Ms. Mayawati in the apex court for quashing the DA case against her.
Seeking review of the apex court’s July 6 judgement, the petitioner has argued that the court had decided the case merely on technical grounds without appreciating the evidence collected by the CBI against Mayawati.
In a major relief to BSP supremo Mayawati, the Supreme Court had on July 6 quashed a nine—year—long disproportionate assets case against her and had pulled up the CBI for exceeding its jurisdiction by lodging an FIR against her without any direction from it.
The apex court had said the DA case against Mayawati was “unwarranted†and the agency proceeded against her without properly understanding its orders which were confined to Taj Corridor case relating to the release of Rs 17 crore by UP government allegedly without sanction.
| Other Articles: |
 |
Vultures in South Asia face imminent extinction (9th Oct, 2012) |
 |
Haryana rapes reflect skewed sex ratio: Child rights panel (9th Oct, 2012) |
 |
Hope BSP will continue support, says Azad (9th Oct, 2012) |
 |
Kerala official in soup over Achuthanandan land case (9th Oct, 2012) |
 |
Global defence industry's slide continued in first half of 2012 (9th Oct, 2012) |
 |
IAF-Army spat over attack copters to be resolved: Antony (9th Oct, 2012) |
 |
India-born expert's triple therapy makes heart beat longer (9th Oct, 2012) |
 |
Royal Rajasthan on Wheels train rolls out on its first commercial journey from Delhi (9th Oct, 2012) |
 |
BJP criticizes Chidambaram over 'CAG, Govt. cast as adversaries' remark (9th Oct, 2012) |
 |
Mayawati sounds election bugle, alleges 'UPA, Akhilesh Govt. are anti-Dalit' (9th Oct, 2012) |
 |
Manmohan Singh promises affordable electricity to all households in five years (9th Oct, 2012) |
 |
'Sonia politicising incidents of rapes in Haryana', alleges BJP (9th Oct, 2012) |
 |
'UPA wants India to move rapidly into ranks of middle-income countries': Sibal (9th Oct, 2012) |
 |
Sonia meets rape victim's kin in Haryana, promises strong action (9th Oct, 2012) |
 |
Congress accuses BJP of befooling people with cheap politics (9th Oct, 2012) |
 |
Public-private partnerships essential to combat budget constraints: C. P. Joshi (9th Oct, 2012) |
 |
No starvation deaths in state: Bengal food minister (9th Oct, 2012) |
 |
Tamil Nadu to file contempt plea against Karnataka (9th Oct, 2012) |
 |
Plastic chairs thrown at Nitish Kumar (9th Oct, 2012) |
 |
Pawar roots for long-term agricultural ex-im policy (9th Oct, 2012) |
 |
Free India would have fragmented without Gandhi: British historian (9th Oct, 2012) |
 |
‘Govt. to work with CAG to restore trust’ (9th Oct, 2012) |
 |
FDI good for farmers and consumers: Pawar (9th Oct, 2012) |
 |
Probe Prashant Bhushan's land purchase in Himachal: Congress (9th Oct, 2012) |
 |
Affordable electricity for all in five years: PM (9th Oct, 2012) |