If Andhra bifurcated, Rayalaseema wants go with Telangana
Thursday - Mar 11, 2010, 11:00am (GMT+5.5)
Hyderabad, March 11 (IANS) Leaders of the Rayalaseema region Wednesday said it should be merged with Telangana if the bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh becomes inevitable.
The leaders of various parties, who met here Wednesday to chalk out their strategy to be adopted before Srikrishna Committee looking into the demand for and against separate Telangana state, strongly opposed bifurcation.
However, if the bifurcation becomes inevitable, Rayalaseema should be merged with Telangana, they felt.
Senior Congress legislator and former minister J.C. Diwakar Reddy said Rayalaseema would not get even a single drop of water without the consent of Telangana.
"Andhra region will have nothing to lose in the event of bifurcation but our interests will be affected," he said.
The leaders cutting across party lines appealed to people to oppose before the Srikrishna panel the demand for separate statehood for Telangana.
The leaders including Y.S. Vivekananda Reddy, brother of late chief minister Y. S. Rajasekhara Reddy, said the interests of the region could be protected only in an unified state.
Another Congress legislator T.G. Venkatesh demanded a special package for the development of Rayalaseema region which comprises four districts of Kurnool, Kadapa, Anantapur and Chittoor.
The Srikrishna Committee, formed by the central government last month, is seeking the opinion of all stakeholders, including political parties, on the demand for a separate Telangana state.
Praja Rajyam Party (PRP) legislator Shoba Nagi Reddy said Rayalaseema's interests should be protected as it sacrificed its capital.
Kurnool was the capital of Andhra state till October 1956 when Andhra was merged with Telangana to form Andhra Pradesh and Hyderabad was made the capital.
Telangana comprises 10 districts, including Hyderabad, while nine districts make up Andhra region.
| Other Articles: |
 |
Jharkhand assembly stalled over demand for CBI probe (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Bengal BJP stages blockades over price rise (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Why no quota for women in Rajya Sabha, asks Mamata (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Lok Sabha adjourned twice as protests continue (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Government will pass women's bill before March 16: minister (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
MPs lack a sense of purpose, say parliament visitors (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Bring Women's Reservation Bill in Lok Sabha, says Opposition (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Rural jobs scheme funds misused in Uttar Pradesh: Congress (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Unfortunate that Trinamool abstained from vote: Left (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
It was worth the risk: Sonia (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Chhattisgarh chief minister, legislators to declare assets (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Woman should be PM for five years: BJP MP (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Sharad Joshi lone dissenter against women's quota bill (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Tripura gives women 50 percent quota in panchayat (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Women's reservation: Views for and against (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
PM's electronic voting panel in Rajya Sabha fails (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
India steps into history with women's quota bill (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Lok Sabha okays railways grants (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Trinamool Congress MPs abstain with eye on Bengal polls (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Women's bill 'historic step forward', says PM (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Trinamool Congress MPs abstain but continue support (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Rajya Sabha merely enforced its code in suspending 7 MPs (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Suspended MPs squat inside house, Rajya Sabha adjourned again (9th Mar, 2010) |
 |
BJP women protest over reservation bill (9th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Protest over women's bill stalls Lok Sabha (9th Mar, 2010) |
|