New Delhi, March 11 (IANS) The Delhi High Court Thursday reserved its order on a paternity suit filed by Rohit Shekhar, who claims to be the biological son of scandal-hit former Andhra Pradesh governor N.D. Tiwari.
A division bench of Justices Vikramjit Sen and Manmohan Singh reserved the order on the maintainability of the petition from Shekhar, who challenged the single-judge bench order of November dismissing his paternity suit.
The single bench order stated that according to an order of Civil Procedure Code (CPC), a person has to file a paternity suit within three years after he has attained the age of majority.
Shekhar, 34, told the division bench that he did not do so owing to poor health.
Senior advocate P.S. Patwali, who argued for Shekhar, stressed that Tiwari's denial in accepting him as his son was the reason for filing this civil suit.
According to Shekhar's petition, Tiwari began neglecting Shekhar and his mother Ujjawala Sharma after 1995 and refused to meet him at Tiwari's residence in Delhi and in Uttranchal when he became the chief minister.
"I (Shekhar) don't want to take this matter out of the court but my father's attitude towards me and my mother forced me to do so," Patwali quoted him as saying.
Senior advocate Rajiv Nayyar, appearing for Tiwari, said: "The petition is out of jurisdiction and is not maintainable."
Tiwari's five-decade-old political career came to a virtual end after a news channel showed clippings of an elderly man purported to be the 86-year-old Tiwari with three young women in bed last year.
A few days later, Tiwari resigned as the Andhra governor citing health grounds.
| Other Articles: |
 |
Women's Reservation Bill now splits BJP (11th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Rajya Sabha adjourned twice over MPs' suspensions (11th Mar, 2010) |
 |
First time after NTR's death son meets stepmother (11th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Government confident women's bill will clear Lok Sabha (11th Mar, 2010) |
 |
If Andhra bifurcated, Rayalaseema wants go with Telangana (11th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Jharkhand assembly stalled over demand for CBI probe (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Bengal BJP stages blockades over price rise (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Why no quota for women in Rajya Sabha, asks Mamata (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Lok Sabha adjourned twice as protests continue (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Government will pass women's bill before March 16: minister (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
MPs lack a sense of purpose, say parliament visitors (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Bring Women's Reservation Bill in Lok Sabha, says Opposition (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Rural jobs scheme funds misused in Uttar Pradesh: Congress (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Unfortunate that Trinamool abstained from vote: Left (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
It was worth the risk: Sonia (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Chhattisgarh chief minister, legislators to declare assets (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Woman should be PM for five years: BJP MP (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Sharad Joshi lone dissenter against women's quota bill (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Tripura gives women 50 percent quota in panchayat (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Women's reservation: Views for and against (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
PM's electronic voting panel in Rajya Sabha fails (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
India steps into history with women's quota bill (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Lok Sabha okays railways grants (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Trinamool Congress MPs abstain with eye on Bengal polls (10th Mar, 2010) |
 |
Women's bill 'historic step forward', says PM (10th Mar, 2010) |