Home births could put babies at risk, say docs
Saturday - Jul 31, 2010, 05:05am (GMT+5.5)
London(ANI): Following a recent study that showed home births are three times riskier for newborns than hospital births, a leading medical journal has said that women do not have 'the right' to choose to give birth at home because it risks the health of their babies.
Doctors have told the Lancet that pregnant women had the right to choose how and where to give birth - but the rights of their unborn child must always take priority.
The editorial said that findings reported in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 'provides the strongest evidence so far that home birth can, after all, be harmful to newborn babies'.
The study found that babies born at home were far more likely to die from heart and breathing problems, which could be because they are not properly monitored for signs of distress or treated in time in an emergency.
The research covered 549,607 births and showed the average mortality rate of babies born in hospital was 0.3 per 1,000 births, but this rose to one per 1,000 births for those born at home, reports The Daily Mail.
"Women have the right to choose how and where to give birth, but they do not have the right to put their baby at risk," an editorial in The Lancet said.
"Home delivery is an option for mothers with uncomplicated pregnancies, provided they are advised of the risks involved, have one-to-one midwife care that includes good resuscitation skills and accreditation by a local regulatory body, and live in a location that allows quick access to obstetric care.
"Hospital delivery should be the preferred method of delivery for high-risk pregnancies, even though it is not without risks," the editorial added.
| Other Articles: |
 |
Archaeologists discover tobacco tins used by Lawrence of Arabia's army (31st Jul, 2010) |
 |
Boffins discover key enzyme in DNA repair pathway (31st Jul, 2010) |
 |
New advance made in TB research (31st Jul, 2010) |
 |
People are sexually attracted to their kin, and their own selves (31st Jul, 2010) |
 |
Oz scientist discovers world's rarest coral in Pacific (31st Jul, 2010) |
 |
Flip-flops ‘can cause injuries’ (30th Jul, 2010) |
 |
Reptiles first conquered dry land 318 million years ago (30th Jul, 2010) |
 |
New clues about cause of brain cell death in Parkinson's, Alzheimer's (30th Jul, 2010) |
 |
Archaeologists uncover Philistine temple ruins in Goliath's hometown (30th Jul, 2010) |
 |
Mechanism affecting Salmonella virulence, drug susceptibility discovered (30th Jul, 2010) |
 |
New fluorescent biosensor to aid drug development (30th Jul, 2010) |
 |
Neutrino project to get clearances despite protests (30th Jul, 2010) |
 |
Silk fibres could pave way for "edible optics" in future (30th Jul, 2010) |
 |
Soon, vaccinations at the speed of light - courtesy lasers (30th Jul, 2010) |
 |
'Most ancient' animal species on Earth discovered in Scotland (30th Jul, 2010) |
 |
Memory's master switch found (30th Jul, 2010) |
 |
iPhone 4's FaceTime video chat feature spawning new industry - iPorn (30th Jul, 2010) |
 |
New find may help make wrinkles history (30th Jul, 2010) |
 |
Politicians' hands could tell voters what's on their mind (30th Jul, 2010) |
 |
Male modesty a turn off for both men and women (30th Jul, 2010) |
 |
'Secret location' of dino skeletons found in South Dakota Badlands (30th Jul, 2010) |
 |
Belly button surgery to simplify and improve kidney ops (30th Jul, 2010) |
 |
Chemicals behind rise of 'gender-bending' fish in southern Alberta (30th Jul, 2010) |
 |
Graphene under strain produces massive pseudo-magnetic fields (30th Jul, 2010) |
 |
Cell that could be 'mother' of all prostate tumours identified (30th Jul, 2010) |
|