10:16 pm - Thursday January 29, 2026

China warns Australia against taking back control of key port in Darwin

1417 Viewed Pallavi Kumar Add Source Preference
U.S. President Donald Trump and China's President Xi Jinping arrive at a state dinner at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, China, November 9, 2017. REUTERS/Thomas Peter

China warns Australia against taking back control of key port in Darwin

**Beijing Signals Potential Repercussions Over Darwin Port Lease Review**

Canberra, Australia – A senior Chinese diplomat has issued a stark warning to the Australian government, suggesting Beijing may respond with unspecified “measures” should Australia move to reclaim control of the strategically important Port of Darwin. The comments, made by China’s Ambassador to Australia, Xiao Qian, underscore the escalating diplomatic tensions surrounding the 99-year lease of the Northern Territory port to a Chinese-owned company.

The lease, granted in 2015 to Landbridge Group, a privately held Chinese firm, has been a persistent point of contention for national security advocates in Australia. Concerns have been raised about the potential implications of Chinese ownership of a key northern port, particularly in the context of regional security and Australia’s alliance with the United States. The Australian government has been reviewing the lease arrangement, a process that has evidently drawn the ire of Beijing.

Ambassador Xiao Qian’s remarks, delivered during a recent press conference, indicated that China views any attempt by Canberra to interfere with the lease as a direct challenge to its economic interests. “If the Australian side takes measures to undermine the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese companies, China will take measures to defend the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese companies,” the Ambassador stated, without elaborating on the nature of these potential retaliatory actions. This veiled threat suggests a willingness by Beijing to escalate the diplomatic dispute beyond mere rhetoric.

The Australian government has consistently maintained that its review of the Port of Darwin lease is a matter of national sovereignty and security, conducted within the framework of Australian law. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has previously stated that decisions regarding the port would be based on national interest assessments, acknowledging the security concerns but also emphasizing the importance of maintaining stable economic relationships. However, the Ambassador’s pronouncements suggest that Beijing perceives these assessments as politically motivated and potentially detrimental to Chinese investment.

The Port of Darwin holds significant strategic value, serving as a vital gateway for trade and a critical logistical hub for military operations in the Indo-Pacific region. Its proximity to Southeast Asia and its role in supporting Australian Defence Force activities have amplified the national security debate surrounding its lease to a foreign entity. The Australian government’s review process is reportedly examining various options, including potential renegotiation of terms, imposition of stricter oversight, or even a complete buyback of the leasehold.

The latest diplomatic salvo from Beijing adds another layer of complexity to Australia’s foreign policy calculus. Navigating the delicate balance between safeguarding national security interests and maintaining economic ties with its largest trading partner remains a paramount challenge for Canberra. The implied threat of retaliatory measures from China could have broader implications, potentially affecting trade, investment, and diplomatic relations across a range of sectors.

As the Australian government continues its internal review, the international community will be closely watching the unfolding situation. The outcome of this port lease dispute could set a significant precedent for foreign investment in critical infrastructure within Australia and may influence the broader geopolitical dynamics in the Indo-Pacific. The coming weeks and months are likely to be a period of heightened diplomatic engagement and potential friction as both nations assert their respective interests.


This article was created based on information from various sources and rewritten for clarity and originality.

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Trumps troop deployment in US cities cost almost $500m in 2025

'I couldn't afford to live in the UK so got one-way ticket for new life abroad'

Related posts