2:48 pm - Saturday August 1, 2026

Yemens Houthis deny plan to charge ships transiting Red Sea

1196 Viewed News Editor Add Source Preference
After U.S. President Barack Obama raised the issue of religious intolerance in India, The New York Times published a very strong editorial criticising Prime Minister Narendra Modi for what it calls his “dangerous silence” on a series of communal events in the country. The editorial, by the NYT editorial board, lists recent attacks on churches and reports of Ghar Vapsi or conversion and marks out the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) for its proposed conversions programme in Ayodhya in March this year, saying the group “was playing with fire.” “Mr. Modi’s continued silence before such troubling intolerance increasingly gives the impression that he either cannot or does not wish to control the fringe elements of the Hindu nationalist right,” the NYT editorial surmised. Full text of the Editorial published in the New York Times on February 6, 2015: What will it take for Prime Minister Narendra Modi to speak out about the mounting violence against India’s religious minorities? Attacks at Christian places of worship have prompted no response from the man elected to represent and to protect all of India’s citizens. Nor has he addressed the mass conversion to Hinduism of Christians and Muslims who have been coerced or promised money. Mr. Modi’s continued silence before such troubling intolerance increasingly gives the impression that he either cannot or does not wish to control the fringe elements of the Hindu nationalist right. Recently, a number of Christian churches in India have been burned and ransacked. Last December, St. Sebastian’s Church in East Delhi was engulfed in fire. Its pastor reported a strong smell of kerosene after the blaze was put out. On Monday, St. Alphonsa’s Church in New Delhi was vandalised. Ceremonial vessels were taken, yet collection boxes full of cash were untouched. Alarmed by the attacks, the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of India has urged the government to uphold the secular nature of India and to assure its Christians they are “protected and secure” in their own country. There is also concern about the mass conversions. Last December, about 200 Muslims were converted to Hinduism in Agra. In January, up to 100 Christians in West Bengal “reconverted” to Hinduism. Hard-line Hindu nationalist groups, like the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), make no secret of their support for a “homecoming” campaign designed to “return” non-Hindus to the fold. More than 80 per cent of Indians are Hindu, but Pravin Togadia of the VHP says his organisation’s goal is a country that is 100 per cent Hindu. The only way to achieve that is to deny religious minorities their faith. The VHP is reportedly planning a mass conversion of 3,000 Muslims in Ayodhya this month. The destruction of the Babri Mosque there in 1992 by Hindu militants touched off riots between Hindus and Muslims across India that left more than 2,000 people dead. The VHP knows it is playing with fire. Mr. Modi has promised an ambitious agenda for India’s development. But, as President Obama observed in a speech in New Delhi last month: “India will succeed so long as it is not splintered along the lines of religious faith.” Mr. Modi needs to break his deafening silence on religious intolerance.

Yemens Houthis deny plan to charge ships transiting Red Sea

### Houthi Administration Rejects Reports of Red Sea Transit Fees

**Sana’a, Yemen** – Officials from the Houthi administration in Yemen have categorically denied recent reports suggesting plans to implement new fees for vessels transiting the vital Red Sea shipping lanes. The administration reiterated its commitment to maintaining the waterway as a free and open passage for international maritime traffic, directly contradicting claims that have circulated in the global shipping community.

The purported new charges, which had sparked concern among shipping companies and international observers, were reportedly aimed at generating revenue. However, a spokesperson for the Houthi Ministry of Transport issued a strong rebuttal, emphasizing that no such policy is under consideration or in effect. The statement affirmed that the Red Sea remains a crucial artery for global trade and that the current administration prioritizes its unimpeded functionality.

This denial comes at a time of heightened geopolitical sensitivity surrounding the Red Sea. The waterway, which connects the Mediterranean Sea to the Indian Ocean via the Suez Canal, is one of the world’s busiest maritime routes, handling a significant percentage of global trade. Any disruption or imposition of new costs could have substantial ripple effects on supply chains and the global economy.

Sources within the Houthi administration indicated that the reports of new fees may have stemmed from a misunderstanding or deliberate misinformation. They stressed that their focus remains on ensuring the security and stability of the region, rather than on leveraging maritime traffic for financial gain. The administration has previously called for an end to the ongoing conflict in Yemen and has expressed a desire for normalized international relations.

The maritime industry has been closely monitoring developments in the Red Sea, given its strategic importance. Shipping companies, insurers, and port authorities rely on predictable and stable operating conditions. Reports of potential new fees, even if unsubstantiated, can lead to increased uncertainty, potentially prompting rerouting of vessels, which incurs additional time and expense.

While the Houthi administration’s denial is clear, the persistence of such reports underscores the complex information environment surrounding Yemen. The ongoing civil war has created a fragmented media landscape, and allegations from various parties often require careful verification. International maritime organizations and governments will likely continue to seek clarification and assurances regarding the status of Red Sea transit to ensure the continued flow of global commerce.

The Houthi administration’s swift and direct refutation of these claims serves as a crucial signal to the international maritime community. By asserting that the Red Sea route remains free to use, they aim to allay fears and prevent any potential negative repercussions on global shipping. The focus now shifts to sustained transparency and adherence to these assurances to foster confidence and maintain the vital role of this critical waterway in international trade. The administration’s stance highlights their stated intention to facilitate, rather than hinder, global maritime operations.


This article was created based on information from various sources and rewritten for clarity and originality.

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Perus ex-president Humala released after conviction overturned

Related posts