4:23 pm - Friday January 23, 2026

Australian, Palestinian lawyers seek police probe of Israeli president

1326 Viewed News Editor Add Source Preference
New Delhi: Prime Minister Narendra Modi with Minister for Foreign Affairs, Australia, Julie Bishop in New Delhi on Tuesday. PTI Photo / PIB (PTI7_18_2017_000225B)

Australian, Palestinian lawyers seek police probe of Israeli president

**Legal Advocates Call for Investigation into Israeli President’s Role in Gaza Conflict**

CANBERRA – Australian and Palestinian legal organizations have jointly submitted a formal request to the Australian Federal Police (AFP), urging them to investigate Israeli President Isaac Herzog for potential complicity in war crimes and genocide related to the ongoing conflict in Gaza. The submission argues that Australia has a legal and moral obligation under international law to investigate individuals suspected of involvement in such grave offenses, regardless of their position or nationality, should they be present within Australian jurisdiction.

The legal groups, which have chosen to remain unnamed due to security concerns, contend that President Herzog’s public statements and actions, particularly those pertaining to the military operations in Gaza, warrant scrutiny under the principles of universal jurisdiction. This principle allows national courts to prosecute individuals for certain heinous crimes, such as genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity, even if the alleged offenses occurred outside of the country’s borders and neither the perpetrator nor the victim is a national of that country.

The submission reportedly details specific instances where President Herzog is alleged to have expressed support for military actions that may have violated international humanitarian law. These instances, according to the legal advocates, include statements that could be interpreted as endorsing collective punishment or failing to adequately distinguish between military targets and civilian populations. The legal brief also highlights the extensive civilian casualties and widespread destruction in Gaza, arguing that these circumstances necessitate a thorough investigation into the role of individuals in positions of command and control.

While the details of the submission remain confidential, it is understood to rely on a combination of publicly available information, including official statements, media reports, and reports from international human rights organizations. The legal groups assert that this information provides sufficient grounds for the AFP to initiate a preliminary investigation to determine whether there is a reasonable basis to believe that President Herzog has committed or is complicit in international crimes.

The call for an investigation has already sparked considerable debate within Australia, with legal experts offering differing opinions on the applicability of universal jurisdiction in this particular case. Some argue that while the principle is well-established in international law, its application is often complex and subject to political considerations. Others maintain that Australia has a clear responsibility to uphold international law and to ensure that individuals suspected of serious crimes are held accountable.

The AFP has confirmed receipt of the submission but has declined to comment further, citing the need to maintain the integrity of any potential investigation. The decision on whether to proceed with an investigation rests with the AFP, and it is unclear how long the process may take. The Australian government has also remained tight-lipped on the matter, emphasizing its commitment to a two-state solution and its desire for a peaceful resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

This legal challenge presents a significant test for Australia’s commitment to international justice and its willingness to hold individuals accountable for alleged war crimes, regardless of their political standing. The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for the application of universal jurisdiction and Australia’s role in upholding international law on the global stage. As the AFP deliberates on the matter, the international community will be watching closely to see how Australia navigates this complex and sensitive issue.


This article was created based on information from various sources and rewritten for clarity and originality.

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Slowing down eating speed reduces hunger

Hunger, death, devastation: No respite in Tigray a year after US aid cuts

Related posts