Bihar Deputy CM Samrat Choudhary responds to PK’s attacks: ‘My lawyer filed affidavit that said I was a minor … but court did not accept it’
Bihar Deputy CM Samrat Choudhary responds to PK’s attacks: ‘My lawyer filed affidavit that said I was a minor … but court did not accept it’
## Bihar Deputy Chief Minister Addresses Disputed Age Claim Following Political Criticism
Patna, Bihar – Bihar Deputy Chief Minister Samrat Choudhary has publicly addressed allegations concerning his age during his earlier political career, specifically responding to recent criticisms levied by political strategist Prashant Kishor, widely known as PK. The Deputy Chief Minister clarified the circumstances surrounding an affidavit filed on his behalf years ago, which claimed he was a minor at the time of an election.
The controversy stems from questions surrounding Choudhary’s eligibility to contest elections in his youth. Kishor, in recent public statements, alluded to discrepancies regarding Choudhary’s age, insinuating that the Deputy Chief Minister may have misrepresented his age to enter politics.
Choudhary, speaking to reporters in Patna on Tuesday, acknowledged that an affidavit had indeed been filed asserting his minority status. However, he emphasized that the court ultimately did not accept the claim. “My lawyer filed an affidavit stating I was a minor,” Choudhary stated, “but the court, after due consideration, did not accept it.”
The Deputy Chief Minister’s explanation attempts to quell the renewed scrutiny surrounding his past. He suggested that the affidavit was a legal strategy employed at the time, but ultimately unsuccessful. While not explicitly detailing the reasons behind the court’s rejection, Choudhary’s statement implies that the court found insufficient evidence to support the claim of his being a minor.
The issue has become a point of contention amidst the ongoing political maneuvering within Bihar. With the state’s political landscape constantly shifting, such allegations can be potent tools for political rivals seeking to undermine their opponents’ credibility. Kishor’s recent criticisms are viewed by many as a calculated move to challenge Choudhary’s position within the ruling coalition.
Political analysts suggest that the resurfacing of this decades-old issue is strategically timed, coinciding with preparations for upcoming elections and internal power struggles within the Bihar government. By raising questions about Choudhary’s past, Kishor aims to damage his reputation and potentially weaken his influence within the political arena.
The implications of this controversy extend beyond the immediate political skirmish. It raises broader questions about the integrity of electoral processes and the accountability of political figures. While Choudhary maintains that the court rejected the minority claim, the fact that such an affidavit was filed in the first place has sparked debate and fueled speculation.
The Deputy Chief Minister’s response, while direct, leaves room for further scrutiny. Critics are likely to demand greater transparency and a more detailed explanation of the events surrounding the affidavit. The issue is unlikely to fade away quickly, and its continued relevance will depend on the extent to which political opponents choose to pursue the matter.
In conclusion, the controversy surrounding Samrat Choudhary’s age continues to simmer, highlighting the often-contentious nature of Indian politics. Whether this resurfaced issue will significantly impact his political career remains to be seen. However, it serves as a stark reminder of the importance of transparency and accountability in public life, and the enduring power of past actions to shape present-day perceptions. The coming weeks will likely reveal whether this incident will be a mere blip on the radar or a more significant challenge to Choudhary’s political standing.
This article was created based on information from various sources and rewritten for clarity and originality.
